4.7 Article

Regional disparities in the CO2 fertilization effect and implications for crop yields

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/014054

Keywords

regional variability; food security; carbon dioxide; water status

Funding

  1. Rockefeller Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although crop yield generally responds positively to increased atmospheric CO2 concentration ([CO2]), the response depends on the species and environmental conditions. Thus, even though global [CO2] is increasing roughly uniformly, regional yield response to increased [CO2] will vary due to differences in climate and the mixture of crops. Although [CO2] effects have been shown to be important for economic and food security impacts of climate change, regional [CO2] effects are not often considered, and the few studies that have considered them disagree on regional patterns. Here regional yield effects of elevated [CO2] are examined by combining experimentally determined CO2 fertilization effect estimates with grid-level data on climate, crop areas, and yields. Production stimulation varies between regions, mostly driven by differences in climate but also by the mixture of crops. The variability in yield due to the variable response to elevated [CO2] is about 50-70% of the variability in yield due to the variable response to climate. There is, however, little agreement between studies regarding which regions benefit most from elevated [CO2]. This is likely because of interactions of CO2 with temperature, species, water status, and nitrogen availability, but no models currently account for all these interactions. These results suggest that regional differences in CO2 effects are of similar importance as regional differences in climate effects and should be included in models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available