4.7 Article

Surface albedo following biochar application in durum wheat

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/014025

Keywords

mitigation strategies; carbon sequestration; land-surface feedbacks; geo-engineering

Funding

  1. EuroCHAR project [FP7-ENV-2010 ID-265179]
  2. Experimental Centre for Vivaism
  3. Italian Biochar Association (ICHAR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The agronomic use of charcoal from biomass pyrolysis (biochar) represents an interesting option for increasing soil fertility and sequestering atmospheric CO2. However, before moving toward large-scale biochar applications, additional research must evaluate all possible land-atmosphere feedbacks. Despite the increasing number of studies investigating the effect of biochar on soil physical, chemical and biological properties, only a few have been done on surface albedo variations on agricultural lands. The present work had the aim of characterizing the annual albedo cycle for a durum wheat crop in Central Italy, by means of a spectroradiometer measurement campaign. Plots treated with biochar, at a rate of 30-60 t ha(-1), showed a surface albedo decrease of up to 80% (after the application) with respect to the control in bare soil conditions, while this difference tended to decrease during the crop growing season, because of the prevailing effect of canopy development on the radiometer response. After the post-harvesting tillage, the soil treated with biochar again showed a lower surface albedo value (<20-26% than the control), while the measurements taken in the second year after application suggested a clear decrease of biochar influence on soil color. The modeling of the surface energy balance highlighted changes in the partitioning of heat fluxes and in particular a substantial increase of ground heat fluxes on an annual basis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available