4.4 Article

Mild Hydrotreating of Biomass Pyrolysis Oils to Produce a Suitable Refinery Feedstock

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages 142-150

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/ep.10419

Keywords

Fwood; thermochemical; bio-fuel; hydrodeoxygenation; hydroprocessing

Funding

  1. United States Department of Energy, Office of the Biomass Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fast pyrolysis produces a liquid product that represents similar to 70% of the mass of the starling material. However; since the raw oil is highly corrosive, largely immiscible with hydrocarbons, and only partly volatile, it is unsuitable for use in a conventional petroleum refinery or as a finished fuel. Catalytic hydroprocessing can remove oxygen to make a gasoline- or diesel-like product but the processing costs have not been attractive. Economic analysis suggests that mild hydroprocesslug, leaving 7 wt % oxygen in the pyrolysis oil reduce hydrotreating costs to a range that is more economically viable. If the physical and chemical properties of the mildly hydrotreated products were acceptable, these materials could potentially be available fur coprocessing in a petroleum refinery leveraging the economies of scale and existing refining infrastructure to produce a lower-cost product. Mildly hydrotreated Pyrolysis oil with low acidity, good miscibility with hydrocarbons, and high volatility was generated in a semibatch laboratory reactor A 0.5-L sample was produced at 360 degrees C, 2500 psig hydrogen, with a hydrogen flow of 0.22 sl/g-oil/h and 10 wt % nickel-molybdenum/Al(2)O(3) catalyst. Yields were 36% light product. (7% oxygen) and 30% liquid residue. This oil will be subjected to further physical and chemical tests to determine the technical feasibility of co-processing in a petroleum. refinery. (C) 2010 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 29: 142-150, 2010*

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available