4.7 Article

Comparison of a bioremediation process of PAHs in a PAH-contaminated soil at field and laboratory scales

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
Volume 165, Issue -, Pages 11-17

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2012.02.004

Keywords

Bioremediation; Contaminated soils; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs); Laboratory and field experiments; Bacterial diversity

Funding

  1. ADEME (Agence de l'Environnement et de la Maitrise de l'Energie)
  2. FEDER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A laboratory experiment was carried on the same initial soil and at the same time than a windrow treatment in order to compare results at field and laboratory scales for a soil mainly contaminated with PAHs. After 6 months, laboratory experiments gave similar but less scattered results than those obtained in the field indicating that the field biotreatment was well optimised. The total amount of PAHs degraded after 6 months was ca. 90% and degradation rates followed a negative exponential trend. Relative degradation rates of 3- and 4-ring PAHs were about 32 and 7.2 times greater than those of 5- and 6-ring PAHs, respectively. With respect to the bacterial community, bacteria belonging to Gamma-proteobacteria persisted whereas Beta-proteobacteria appeared after three months of biotreatment when PAH concentration was low enough to render the soil non-ecotoxic. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available