4.7 Article

Determination of antibiotics in sewage from hospitals, nursery and slaughter house, wastewater treatment plant and source water in Chongqing region of Three Gorge Reservoir in China

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
Volume 158, Issue 5, Pages 1444-1450

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2009.12.034

Keywords

Antibiotics; Solid-phase extraction (SPE); Liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (LC/ESI-MS/MS); Three Gorge Reservoir; China

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30671727, 50804049]
  2. Chinese National Program for Key ST Project [2003BA869C]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sewage samples from 4 hospitals, 1 nursery, 1 slaughter house, 1 wastewater treatment plant and 5 source water samples of Chongqing region of Three Gorge Reservoir were analyzed for macrolide, lincosamide, trimethoprim, fluorouinolone, sulfonamide and tetracycline antibiotics by online solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Results showed that the concentration of ofloxacin (OFX) in hospital was the highest among all water environments ranged from 1.660 mu g/L to 4.240 mu g/L and norfloxacin (NOR, 0.136-1.620 mu g/L), ciproflaxacin (CIP, ranged from 0.011 mu g/L to 0.136 mu g/L), trimethoprim (IMP, 0.061-0.174 mu g/L) were commonly detected. Removal range of antibiotics in the wastewater treatment plant was 18-100% and the removal ratio of tylosin, oxytetracycline and tetracycline were 100%. Relatively higher removal efficiencies were observed for tylosin (TYL), oxytetracycline (OXY) and tetracycline (TET)(100%), while lower removal efficiencies were observed for Trimethoprim (IMP, 1%), Epi-iso-chlorotetracycline (EICIC, 18%) and Erythromycin-H2O (ERY-H2O, 24%). Antibiotics were removed more efficiently in primary treatment compared with those in secondary treatment. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available