4.5 Article

Accumulation and risks of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and trace metals in tropical urban soils

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT
Volume 186, Issue 5, Pages 2907-2923

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-013-3589-1

Keywords

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs); Trace metals; Principal component analysis; Enrichment factors; Index of geoaccumulation; Delhi

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study deals with the combined contribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and metals to health risk in Delhi soils. Surface soils (05 cm) collected from three different land-use regions (industrial, flood-plain and a reference site) in Delhi, India over a period of 1 year were characterized with respect to 16 US Environmental Protection Agency priority PAHs and five trace metals (Zn, Fe, Ni, Cr and Cd). Mean annual Sigma(16)PAH concentrations at the industrial and flood-plain sites (10,893.2 +/- 2826.4 and 3075.4 +/- 948.7 mu g/kg, respectively) were similar to 15 and similar to 4 times, respectively, higher than reference levels. Significant spatial and seasonal variations were observed for PAHs. Toxicity potentials of industrial and flood-plain soils were similar to 88 and similar to 8 times higher than reference levels. Trace metal concentrations in soils also showed marked dependencies on nearness to sources and seasonal effects. Correlation analysis, PAH diagnostic ratios and principal component analysis (PCA) led to the identification of sources such as coal and wood combustion, vehicular and industrial emissions, and atmospheric transport. Metal enrichment in soil and the degree of soil contamination were investigated using enrichment factors and index of geoaccumulation, respectively. Health risk assessment (incremental lifetime cancer risk and hazard index) showed that floodplain soils have potential high risk due to PAHs while industrial soils have potential risks due to both PAHs and Cr.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available