Journal
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT
Volume 185, Issue 12, Pages 10281-10295Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-013-3332-y
Keywords
Deepwater Horizon oil spill; Dispersant use; TPH; TPAH; Monitoring; Dispersant effectiveness
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The Special Monitoring of Applied Response Technologies (SMART) program was used during the Deepwater Horizon oil spill as a strategy to monitor the effectiveness of sea surface dispersant use. Although SMART was implemented during aerial and vessel dispersant applications, this analysis centers on the effort of a special dispersant missions onboard the M/V International Peace, which evaluated the effectiveness of surface dispersant applications by vessel only. Water samples (n = 120) were collected from background sites, and under naturally and chemically dispersed oil slicks, and were analyzed for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (TPAHs), total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), and a chemical marker of CorexitA (R) (dipropylene glycol n-butyl ether, DPnB). Water chemistry results were analyzed relative to SMART field assessments of dispersant effectiveness (not effective, effective, and very effective), based on in situ fluorometry. Chemistry data were also used to indirectly determine if the use of dispersants increased the risk of acute effects to water column biota, by comparison to toxicity benchmarks. TPAH and TPH concentrations in background, and naturally and chemically dispersed samples were extremely variable, and differences were not statistically detected across sample types. Ratios of TPAH and TPH between chemically and naturally dispersed samples provided a quantitative measure of dispersant effectiveness over natural oil dispersion alone, and were in reasonable agreement with SMART field assessments of dispersant effectiveness. Samples from effective and very effective dispersant applications had ratios of TPAH and TPH up to 35 and 64, respectively. In two samples from an effective dispersant application, TPHs and TPAHs exceeded acute benchmarks (0.81 mg/L and 8 mu g/L, respectively), while none exceeded DPnB's chronic value (1,000 mu g/L). Although the primary goal of the SMART program is to provide near real-time effectiveness data to the response, and not to address concerns regarding acute biological effects, the analyses presented here demonstrate that SMART can generate information of value to a larger scientific audience. A series of recommendations for future SMART planning are also provided.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available