4.5 Article

Fraction characteristics of rare earth elements in the surface sediment of Bohai Bay, North China

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT
Volume 184, Issue 12, Pages 7275-7292

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-011-2496-6

Keywords

Rare earth elements; Fraction; Provenance; Depositional environment; Surface sediments; Bohai Bay

Funding

  1. Fund for Creative Research Groups by NSFC [40821004]
  2. National Key Project for Basic Research of China [2007CB407305]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences
  4. East China Sea Fisheries Research Institute [2011T07]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Surface sediment samples were collected at 27 stations of Bohai Bay, North China. Sequential extractions were carried out in this study. REE were leached out from four labile fractions: Exchangeable (L1), bound to carbonates (L2), bound to Fe-Mn oxides (L3), bound to organic matter (L4), and the remainder was residual (R5). The total contents of REE fluctuate slightly in Bohai Bay, and are mainly concentrated in the middle region, showing relatively higher levels in the north than that in the south of Bohai Bay. Percentages of L1, L2, L3, L4, and R5 for REE suggest that the residual fraction accounts for the major component of REE, whereas Fe-Mn oxides also play important roles in combining labile REE. As the REE complex is not stabilized, the competition of complex could induce dissociation of the complex and redistribution of the REE in various environments. According to REE patterns and Y/Ho ratios of samples, REE are not anthropogenic or oceanic sources but riverine input, whereas suitable environment varieties can slightly affect the patterns and fractionations of REE. As powerful tracers for the variable of environment, higher anomaly of Eu and Ce in southern regions indicates a greater reduction in the condition of surface sediment in the south than that in the north of Bohai Bay.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available