4.5 Article

Heavy metal in surface sediments of the Liaodong Bay, Bohai Sea: distribution, contamination, and sources

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT
Volume 185, Issue 6, Pages 5071-5083

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-012-2926-0

Keywords

Heavy metals; Sediment contamination; Environmental assessment; Sediment quality guidelines; Liaodong Bay

Funding

  1. Ministry of Land and Resources [1212011088110]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40976036, 40906033, 41206049]
  3. Open Foundation of the State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology [SKLLQG1107]
  4. Open Foundation of the Key Laboratory of Marine Hydrocarbon Resources and Environmental Geology [MRE201231]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In an effort to assess the potential contamination and determine the environmental risks associated with heavy metals, the surface sediments in Liaodong Bay, northeast China, were systematically sampled and analyzed for the concentrations of Cu, Pb, Zn, Cr, Ni, As, and Hg. The metal enrichment factor (EF) and geoaccumulation index (I (geo)) were calculated to assess the anthropogenic contamination in the region. Results showed that heavy metal concentrations in the sediments generally met the criteria of China Marine Sediment Quality (GB18668-2002); however, both EF and I (geo) values suggested the elevation of Pb concentration in the region. Based on the effect-range classification (TEL-PEL SQGs), Cu, Pb, Ni, and As were likely to pose environment risks, and the toxic units decreased in the order: Ni > Pb > Cr > Zn > As > Cu > Hg. The spatial distribution of ecotoxicological index (mean-ERM-quotient) suggested that most of the surface sediments were low-medium priority zone. Multivariate analysis indicated that the sources of Cr, Ni, Zn, Cu, and Hg resulted primarily from parent rocks, and Pb or As were mainly attributed to anthropogenic sources. The results of this study would provide a useful aid for sustainable marine management in the region.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available