4.5 Article

Elemental composition of sediments in Lake Jinzai, Japan: Assessment of sources and pollution

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT
Volume 184, Issue 7, Pages 4383-4396

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-011-2271-8

Keywords

Lake sediment; Trace elements; Environmental guidelines; Geoaccumulation index; Southwest Japan

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion Science (JSPS), Japan
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21241001] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bottom sediments from Lake Jinzai in southwest Japan were analyzed to determine their chemical compositions and to assess the potential for ecological harm by comparison with sediment quality guidelines. The pollution status of lake sediments was evaluated by employing contamination factor (CF), pollution load index (PLI), and geoaccumulation index (I (geo)), focusing on a suite of elements in lakebed and core sediments. Elevated concentrations of As, Pb, Zn, Cu, TOC, N, and P were present in several layers of the upper core and other surface sediments. The elevated metal concentrations are likely related to the fine-grained nature of the sediments, reducing bottom conditions produced by abundant organic matter, and possibly minor non-point anthropogenic sources. Moreover, correlations between the concentrations of trace metals and organic carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, and iron, suggest that these elements play a role in controlling abundances. Calculated CF, PLI, and I (geo) indicate that the sediments are strongly polluted with respect to As, moderately to strongly polluted with Zn, and moderately polluted with Pb and Cu. Metal concentrations exceed the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) lowest effect level and the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) interim sediment quality guidelines that indicate moderate impact on aquatic organisms in the study area.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available