Journal
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT
Volume 177, Issue 1-4, Pages 115-125Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-010-1622-1
Keywords
Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction; One-variable-at-a-time; Central composite design; Cd (II); Environmental water samples
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction followed by inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry has been investigated for determination of Cd(II) ions in water samples. Ammonium pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate was used as chelating agent. Several factors influencing the microextraction efficiency of Cd (II) ions such as extracting and dispersing solvent type and their volumes, pH, sample volume, and salting effect were optimized. The optimization was performed both via one variable at a time, and central composite design methods and the optimum conditions were selected. Both optimization methods showed nearly the same results: sample size 5 mL; dispersive solvent ethanol; dispersive solvent volume 2 mL; extracting solvent chloroform; extracting solvent volume 200 mu L; pH and salt amount do not affect significantly the microextraction efficiency. The limits of detection and quantification were 0.8 and 2.5 ng L-1, respectively. The relative standard deviation for five replicate measurements of 0.50 mg L-1 of Cd (II) was 4.4%. The recoveries for the spiked real samples from tap, mineral, river, dam, and sea waters samples ranged from 92.2% to 104.5%.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available