4.5 Article

Distribution and enrichment of acid-leachable heavy metals in the intertidal sediments from Quanzhou Bay, southeast coast of China

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT
Volume 173, Issue 1-4, Pages 107-116

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-010-1374-y

Keywords

Acid leachable; Heavy metals; Enrichment; Intertidal sediment; Quanzhou Bay

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40673061]
  2. Science and Technology of Quanzhou city government [2008Z9]
  3. Foundation of the State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences [SKLEG7021]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The article presents the distribution and enrichment of acid-leachable heavy metals (ALHMs) Cu, Zn, Pb, Cr, Mn, and Fe in the intertidal sediments collected from Quanzhou Bay, southeast coast of China. The contents of ALHMs along with sediment texture, total organic carbon, S(2-), and CaCO(3) in surface sediments were analyzed to identify the input of heavy metals from various sources. The enrichment of ALHMs in the sediments is mainly attributed to the intense industrial activities around Quanzhou Bay and to the serried activities of intertidal breed aquatics along the seacoast. The results also illustrate the association between the ALHMs with the finer fractions, organic matter, and Fe oxyhydroxides in the sediments. The above results were very supported by the multivariate statistical analyses, including correlation, principal component analysis, and hierarchical clustering analysis. Comparative results of ALHMs in the intertidal sediments from Quanzhou Bay with those in other domestic bays and estuaries indicate that the study area has been enriched with heavy metals, especially with Zn, Cu, and Pb, during the past few decades. The results of the present study suggest that the authorities should pay attention to the current status and take some measures to control the heavy metal pollution in the study area.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available