4.5 Article

Environmental contaminants in Canadian shorebirds

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT
Volume 148, Issue 1-4, Pages 185-204

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-007-0150-0

Keywords

Arsenic; Cadmium; Canada; DDT; Mercury; PCBs; Organochlorines; Selenium; Shorebirds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Canadian shorebirds are exposed to environmental contaminants throughout their annual cycle. Contaminant exposure among species varies with diet, foraging behaviour and migration patterns. We sampled twelve species of shorebirds from four locations across Canada to assess their exposure to PCBs, organochlorine pesticides, as well as four trace elements (Hg, Se, Cd, As). Sigma PCB and Sigma DDT followed by Sigma CHL were most frequently found above trace level in the shorebird carcasses. In general, the plover species (American golden, semipalmated, black-bellied) appear to be the most contaminated with organochlorines, whereas Hudsonian and marbled godwits appear to be the least contaminated. Among adult birds, the greater and lesser yellowlegs had the highest hepatic Hg concentrations (2.4-2.7 mu g g(-1) dw), whereas American golden plovers as well as Hudsonian and marbled godwits contained relatively low levels of Hg (< 1 mu g g(-1) dw). Renal Se concentrations varied from 3.2 to 16.7 mu g g(-1) dw and exhibited little interspecific or seasonal variation. Renal Cd levels in adult birds were highest in Hudsonian godwits from Quill Lakes (43 mu g g(-1) dw) and Cape Churchill (12 mu g g(-1) dw), and lowest (0.8-1.5 mu g g(-1) dw) in greater and lesser yellowlegs from Cape Churchill and Bay of Fundy. Renal As concentrations varied from 0.06 mu g g(-1) dw in golden plovers from Cape Churchill to 4.6 and 5.1 mu g g(-1) dw in dunlin samples from the Pacific coast. There is no evidence that contaminants were adversely affecting the shorebirds sampled from the Canadian locations in this study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available