4.7 Article

Conefor Sensinode 2.2: A software package for quantifying the importance of habitat patches for landscape connectivity

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages 135-139

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.05.005

Keywords

connectivity; conservation priorities; graph theory; landscape planning; habitat availability; ecological networks; landscape patterns

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science
  2. European FEDER [REN2003-01628]
  3. IBEPFOR [CGL2006-00312]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Maintaining and restoring landscape connectivity is currently a central concern in ecology and biodiversity conservation, and there is an increasing demand of user-driven tools for integrating connectivity in landscape planning. Here we describe the new Conefor Sensinode 2.2 (CS22) software, which quantifies the importance of habitat patches for maintaining or improving functional landscape connectivity and is conceived as a tool for decision-making support in landscape planning and habitat conservation. CS22 is based on graph structures, which have been suggested to possess the greatest benefit to effort ratio for conservation problems regarding landscape connectivity. CS22 includes new connectivity metrics based on the habitat availability concept, which considers a patch itself as a space where connectivity occurs, integrating in a single measure the connected habitat area existing within the patches with the area made available by the connections between different habitat patches. These new metrics have been shown to present improved properties compared to other existing metrics and are particularly suited to the identification of critical landscape elements for connectivity. CS22 is distributed together with GIS extensions that allow for directly generating the required input files from a GIS layer. CS22 and related documentation can be freely downloaded from the World Wide Web. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available