4.7 Article

Development and comparative analysis of tropospheric ozone prediction models using linear and artificial intelligence-based models in Mexicali, Baja California (Mexico) and Calexico, California (US)

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages 1056-1069

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.11.009

Keywords

US-Mexico border; ozone neural network modeling; Multilayer Perceptron (MLP); ELMAN neural network; Support Vector Machine; Ridge Regression; Model Validation Kit (MvK); transboundary air quality

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed 12 prediction models using two types of data matrix (daily means and a selection of the mean for the first 6 h of the day). The Persistence parametric prediction technique was applied separately to these matrices, as well as semiparametric Ridge Regression and three non-parametric or artificial intelligence techniques: Support Vector Machine, Multilayer Perceptron and ELMAN networks. The target was the prediction of maximum tropospheric ozone concentrations for the next day in the Mexicali-Calexico border area. The main ozone precursors and meteorological parameters were used for the different models. The proposals were evaluated using specific performance measurements for the air quality models established in the Model Validation Kit and recommended by the US Environmental Protection Agency. Results with similar margins of error were obtained in various models developed in this study, and some of them have provided smaller margins of error than similar prediction models existing in the literature developed in other regions. For this reason, we consider it feasible to apply the prediction models developed and they could be useful for supporting decisions in the matter of ozone pollution in the region under study, as well as for use in daily forecasting in this area. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available