4.6 Article

Diatom populations in an upwelling environment decrease silica content to avoid growth limitation

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages 4184-4193

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.14431

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [OCE-1155663]
  2. National Institute of Health [1 S10 OD010610-01A1]
  3. OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR, NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH [S10OD010610] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A mix of adaptive strategies enable diatoms to sustain rapid growth in dynamic ocean regions, making diatoms one of the most productive primary producers in the world. We illustrate one such strategy off coastal California that facilitates continued, high, cell division rates despite silicic acid stress. Using a fluorescent dye to measure single-cell diatom silica production rates, silicification (silica per unit area) and growth rates we show diatoms decrease silicification and maintain growth rate when silicon concentration limits silica production rates. While this physiological response to silicon stress was similar across taxa, in situ silicic acid concentration limited silica production rates by varying degrees for taxa within the same community. Despite this variability among taxa, silicon stress did not alter the contribution of specific taxa to total community silica production or to community composition. Maintenance of division rate at the expense of frustule thickness decreases cell density which could affect regional biogeochemical cycles. The reduction in frustule silicification also creates an ecological tradeoff: thinner frustules increase susceptibility to predation but reducing Si quotas maximizes cell abundance for a given pulse of silicic acid, thereby favouring a larger eventual population size which facilitates diatom persistence in habitats with pulsed resource supplies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available