4.3 Article

A questionnaire-based survey on 3D image-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer in Japan: advances and obstacles

Journal

JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages 897-903

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrv047

Keywords

image-guided brachytherapy; cervical cancer; 3D planning; questionnaire-based survey; high-dose-rate brachytherapy

Funding

  1. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare [10103757]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [26461879]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26461879] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study is to survey the current patterns of practice, and barriers to implementation, of 3D image-guided brachytherapy (3D-IGBT) for cervical cancer in Japan. A 30-item questionnaire was sent to 171 Japanese facilities where high-dose-rate brachytherapy devices were available in 2012. In total, 135 responses were returned for analysis. Fifty-one facilities had acquired some sort of 3D imaging modality with applicator insertion, and computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were used in 51 and 3 of the facilities, respectively. For actual treatment planning, X-ray films, CT and MRI were used in 113, 20 and 2 facilities, respectively. Among 43 facilities where X-ray films and CT or MRI were acquired with an applicator, 29 still used X-ray films for actual treatment planning, mainly because of limited time and/or staffing. In a follow-up survey 2.5 years later, respondents included 38 facilities that originally used X-ray films alone but had indicated plans to adopt 3D-IGBT. Of these, 21 had indeed adopted CT imaging with applicator insertion. In conclusion, 3D-IGBT (mainly CT) was implemented in 22 facilities (16%) and will be installed in 72 (53%) facilities in the future. Limited time and staffing were major impediments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available