4.3 Article

Estimation of the total rectal dose of radical external beam and intracavitary radiotherapy for uterine cervical cancer using the deformable image registration method

Journal

JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH
Volume 56, Issue 3, Pages 546-552

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rru127

Keywords

DIR; cervical cancer; rectal dose; brachytherapy

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [25861098]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25861098] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We adapted the deformable image registration (DIR) technique to accurately calculate the cumulative intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) rectal dose for treating uterine cervical cancer. A total of 14 patients with primary cervical cancer radically treated with ICRT and EBRT were analysed using the Velocity AI(TM) software. Computed tomography (CT) images were registered, and EBRT and ICBT dose distributions were determined. Cumulative D-2cm(3), D-1cm(3) and D-0.1cm(3) were calculated by simple addition of fractional values or by DIR. The accuracy of DIR was evaluated by means of a virtual phantom mimicking the rectum. The dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was calculated to evaluate rectal contour concordance between CT images before and after DIR. Virtual phantom analysis revealed that the average difference between the DIR-based phantom D-mean and the simple phantom D-mean was 1.9 +/- 2.5 Gy (EQD(2)), and the DIR method included an uncertainty of similar to 8.0%. The mean DSC between reference CT and CT was significantly improved after DIR (EBRT: 0.43 vs 0.85, P < 0.005; ICBT: 0.60 vs 0.87, P < 0.005). The average simple rectal D-2cm(3), D-1cm(3) and D-0.1cm(3) values were 77.6, 81.6 and 91.1 Gy (EQD(2)), respectively; the DIR-based values were 76.2, 79.5 and 87.6 Gy, respectively. The simple addition values were overestimated, on average, by 3.1, 3.7 and 5.5 Gy, respectively, relative to the DIR-based values. In conclusion, the difference between the simple rectal dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameter addition and DIR-based cumulative rectal doses increased with decreasing DVH parameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available