4.6 Article

Thiosulfate dehydrogenase: a widespread unusual acidophilic c-type cytochrome

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages 2673-2688

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02820.x

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [DA 351/7-1]
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT, Portugal) [PTDC/QUI-BIQ/100591/2008]
  3. FEDER
  4. Luso-German Joint Action
  5. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD)
  6. Conselho de Reitores das Universidades Portuguesas
  7. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/QUI-BIQ/100591/2008] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work we identified the gene for the tetrathionate-forming thiosulfate dehydrogenase (TsdA) from the purple sulfur bacterium Allochromatium vinosum by sequence analysis and reverse genetics. The recombinant protein produced in Escherichia coli is a periplasmic, monomeric 25.8 kDa dihaem cytochrome c with an enzyme activity optimum at pH 4. UV-visible and electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy indicate methionine (strictly conserved M222 or M236) and cysteine (C123) as probable sixth distal axial ligands of the two haem irons in TsdA. These results place TsdA in the group of c-type cytochromes with an unusual axial histidine-cysteine coordination of the haem iron. These proteins appear to play a pivotal role in sulfur-based energy metabolism. Exchange of C123 to glycine rendered thiosulfate dehydrogenase inactive, proving the importance of this residue for catalysis. TsdA homologues are present in a-, beta-, d-, ?- and e-Proteobacteria. Three of these were produced in E. coli and exhibited the expected enzymatic activity. The widespread occurrence of tsdA agrees with reports of tetrathionate formation not only by specialized sulfur oxidizers but also by many chemoorganoheterotrophs that use thiosulfate as a supplemental but not as the sole energy source.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available