4.6 Review

New directions in coral reef microbial ecology

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages 833-844

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02597.x

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) [OCE09-62721]
  3. Robert and Patricia Switzer Foundation
  4. Directorate For Geosciences
  5. Division Of Ocean Sciences [0962721] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microbial processes largely control the health and resilience of coral reef ecosystems, and new technologies have led to an exciting wave of discovery regarding the mechanisms by which microbial communities support the functioning of these incredibly diverse and valuable systems. There are three questions at the forefront of discovery: What mechanisms underlie coral reef health and resilience? How do environmental and anthropogenic pressures affect ecosystem function? What is the ecology of microbial diseases of corals? The goal is to understand the functioning of coral reefs as integrated systems from microbes and molecules to regional and ocean-basin scale ecosystems to enable accurate predictions of resilience and responses to perturbations such as climate change and eutrophication. This review outlines recent discoveries regarding the microbial ecology of different microenvironments within coral ecosystems, and highlights research directions that take advantage of new technologies to build a quantitative and mechanistic understanding of how coral health is connected through microbial processes to its surrounding environment. The time is ripe for natural resource managers and microbial ecologists to work together to create an integrated understanding of coral reef functioning. In the context of long-term survival and conservation of reefs, the need for this work is immediate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available