4.6 Article

A distinct freshwater-adapted subgroup of ANME-1 dominates active archaeal communities in terrestrial subsurfaces in Japan

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages 3206-3218

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02517.x

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan [22710035, 20244089]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22710035, 20244089] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Anaerobic methane-oxidizing archaea (ANME) are known to play an important role in methane flux, especially in marine sediments. The 16S rRNA genes of ANME have been detected in terrestrial freshwater subsurfaces. However, it is unclear whether ANME are actively involved in methane oxidation in these environments. To address this issue, Holocene sediments in the subsurface of the Kanto Plain in Japan were collected for biogeochemical and molecular analysis. The potential activity of the anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) (0.38-3.54 nmol cm(-3) day(-1)) was detected in sediment slurry incubation experiments with a (CH4)-C-13 tracer. Higher AOM activity was observed in low-salinity treatment compared with high-salinity condition (20 parts per thousand), which supports the adaptation of ANME in freshwater habitats. The 16S rRNA sequence analysis clearly revealed the presence of a distinct subgroup of ANME-1, designated ANME-1a-FW. Phylogenetic analysis of the mcrA genes also implied the presence of the distinct subgroup in ANME-1. ANME-1a-FW was found to be the most dominant active group in the archaeal communities on the basis of 16S rRNA analysis (75.0-93.8% of total archaeal 16S rRNA clones). Sulfate-reducing bacteria previously known as the syntrophic bacterial partners of ANME-1 was not detected. Our results showed that ANME-1a-FW is adapted to freshwater habitats and is responsible for AOM in terrestrial freshwater subsurface environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available