4.7 Review

The Navigation Guide-Evidence-Based Medicine Meets Environmental Health: Systematic Review of Human Evidence for PFOA Effects on Fetal Growth

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
Volume 122, Issue 10, Pages 1028-1039

Publisher

US DEPT HEALTH HUMAN SCIENCES PUBLIC HEALTH SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1307893

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. New York Community Trust
  2. U.S. EPA [GAIA-0-6-UCSF 17288]
  3. Internship/Research Participation Program at the National Center for Environmental Economics, U.S. EPA
  4. Clarence Heller Foundation
  5. Passport Foundation
  6. Forsythia Foundation
  7. Johnson Family Foundation
  8. Heinz Endowments
  9. Fred Gellert Foundation
  10. Rose Foundation
  11. Kaiser Permanente
  12. UCSF Institute for Health Policy Studies
  13. Planned Parenthood Federation of America
  14. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [ES018135, ESO22841]
  15. U.S. EPA STAR [RD83467801, RD83543301]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: The Navigation Guide methodology was developed to meet the need for a robust method of systematic and transparent research synthesis in environmental health science. We conducted a case study systematic review to support proof of concept of the method. OBJECTIVE: We applied the Navigation Guide systematic review methodology to determine whether developmental exposure to perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) affects fetal growth in humans. METHODS: We applied the first 3 steps of the Navigation Guide methodology to human epidemiological data: 1) specify the study question, 2) select the evidence, and 3) rate the quality and strength of the evidence. We developed a protocol, conducted a comprehensive search of the literature, and identified relevant studies using prespecified criteria. We evaluated each study for risk of bias and conducted meta-analyses on a subset of studies. We rated quality and strength of the entire body of human evidence. RESULTS: We identified 18 human studies that met our inclusion criteria, and 9 of these were combined through meta-analysis. Through meta-analysis, we estimated that a 1-ng/mL increase in serum or plasma PFOA was associated with a -18.9 g (95% CI: -29.8, -7.9) difference in birth weight. We concluded that the risk of bias across studies was low, and we assigned a moderate quality rating to the overall body of human evidence. CONCLUSION: On the basis of this first application of the Navigation Guide systematic review methodology, we concluded that there is sufficient human evidence that developmental exposure to PFOA reduces fetal growth.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available