4.7 Article

Association between Pregnancy Loss and Urinary Phthalate Levels around the Time of Conception

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
Volume 120, Issue 3, Pages 458-463

Publisher

US DEPT HEALTH HUMAN SCIENCES PUBLIC HEALTH SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1103552

Keywords

abortion; MEHP; phthalates; pregnancy loss

Funding

  1. Aarhus University Research Foundation
  2. Danish Medical Research Council
  3. Danish Medical Health Insurance Foundation
  4. Danish Ministry of Environment
  5. Lundbeck Foundation
  6. AFA (Swedish Labor Market Insurance Company)
  7. Swedish Research Council
  8. Lundbeck Foundation [R5-2006-316] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Animal studies indicate that some phthalate metabolites may harm female reproductive function. OBJECTIVES: We assessed the associations between exposure to phthalate metabolites and pregnancy loss. METHODS: Using a previously established cohort of couples planning their first pregnancy, we analyzed four primary and two oxidized secondary phthalate metabolites in urine samples collected on day 10 after the first day of the last menstrual period before conception occurred (n = 128) and during the previous cycle (if any, is = 111). Subclinical embryonal loss was identified by repeated measurement of urinary human chorionic gonadotropin, and information on clinical spontaneous abortions was obtained by telephone interview with the mother. RESULTS: Pregnancy loss (n = 48) was increased among women with urinary concentration of monoethylhexyl phthalate (MEHP) in the upper tertile in the conception sample compared with women in the lowest tertile [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 2.9; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1, 7.6]. The corresponding OR for subclinical embryonal loss (n = 32) was 40.7 (95% Cl: 4.5, 369.5). CONCLUSIONS: The phthalate metabolite MEHP was associated with higher occurrence of pregnancy loss. Because this is the first human study to show this association and the sample size is small, the findings need to be corroborated in independent studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available