4.7 Article

Influenza epidemics, seasonality, and the effects of cold weather on cardiac mortality

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1476-069X-11-74

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Marie Curie International Fellowship within the 6th European Community Framework Programme
  2. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [ES00002, R21 ES020695-01]
  3. Environmental Protection Agency [R83479801]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: More people die in the winter from cardiac disease, and there are competing hypotheses to explain this. The authors conducted a study in 48 US cities to determine how much of the seasonal pattern in cardiac deaths could be explained by influenza epidemics, whether that allowed a more parsimonious control for season than traditional spline models, and whether such control changed the short term association with temperature. Methods: The authors obtained counts of daily cardiac deaths and of emergency hospital admissions of the elderly for influenza during 1992-2000. Quasi-Poisson regression models were conducted estimating the association between daily cardiac mortality, and temperature. Results: Controlling for influenza admissions provided a more parsimonious model with better Generalized Cross-Validation, lower residual serial correlation, and better captured Winter peaks. The temperature-response function was not greatly affected by adjusting for influenza. The pooled estimated increase in risk for a temperature decrease from 0 to -5 degrees C was 1.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-2.1%). Influenza accounted for 2.3% of cardiac deaths over this period. Conclusions: The results suggest that including epidemic data explained most of the irregular seasonal pattern (about 18% of the total seasonal variation), allowing more parsimonious models than when adjusting for seasonality only with smooth functions of time. The effect of cold temperature is not confounded by epidemics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available