4.6 Article

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in agricultural soils from Ningde, China: levels, sources, and human health risk assessment

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL GEOCHEMISTRY AND HEALTH
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages 907-919

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10653-018-0188-7

Keywords

PAHs; Arable soil; Ningde; Incremental lifetime cancer risk; Positive matrix factorization

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41073070, 41473095, 41773124]
  2. Open Research Fund of Joint Innovative Centre for pollution control and the resource utilization technology in mining area, Hubei Polytechnic University [xt201302]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soil-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in farmland are critical to human health. The level, composition, source, and cancer risk of sixteen PAHs in agricultural soil from Ningde, China, were investigated. The results indicated that the total concentrations of 16 PAHs ranged from 77.3 to 1188ngg(-1), with a mean value of 406ngg(-1). Five-ring PAHs were found to have the highest concentrations (148 +/- 133ngg(-1)), followed by four-ring (120 +/- 101ngg(-1)), three-ring (61.9 +/- 54.2ngg(-1)), six-ring (44.6 +/- 61.0ngg(-1)), and two-ring (31.3 +/- 31.0ngg(-1)). Employing positive matrix factorization (PMF), four PAH sources including biomass burning (36.3%), coal combustion (35.5%), traffic emissions (16.4%), and coke source (11.8%) were identified. Incremental lifetime cancer risk (ILCR) results showed that ILCR values ranged from 7.1x10(-4) to 1.1x10(-3), which will cause moderate-to-high cancer risk to human health mainly via the soil ingestion and dermal contact exposure pathways. The source-oriented results indicated that coal combustion (32.7%), traffic emission (34.3%), and biomass burning (32.4%) had similar contributions to the total cancer risk. Therefore, more attention should be paid to these pyrolysis-originated sources to protect humanity from the health risk of PAHs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available