4.4 Article

Effects of Temperature on Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) Larvae and Pupae

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL ENTOMOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages 1323-1335

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1603/EN09369

Keywords

temperature; survival; pupation; development; degree-days; Asian longhorned beetle

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Developmental thresholds, degree-days for development, larval weights, and head capsule widths for each larval instar and the pupal stage of Anoplophora glabripennis (Motschulsky) (Coleoptera Cerambycidae) were studied at eight constant temperatures (5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, and 40 degrees C) for two source populations (Ravenswood, Chicago, IL [IL], and Bayside, Queens, NY [NY]) The estimated lower threshold temperature for development of instars 1-5 and the pupal stage was near 10 degrees C and was near 12 degrees C for the higher instars Developmental rate was less temperature sensitive for instars 5-9 compared with instars 1-4. Development for all but the first instar was inhibited at constant temperatures >30 degrees C, and all instars failed to develop at 40 degrees C. Although the two source populations had similar responses to temperature, IL larvae were heavier than those from NY Temperature and its influence on larval weight had profound impacts on whether it larva proceeded to pupation. Based on the temperature effects detailed here, larval development and pupation should be possible in most of the continental United States where suitable hosts are available These data can be used to develop a degree-day model to estimate beetle phenology; however, at least 2 degrees C should be added to air temperatures to adjust for the mediation of temperature by the wood. These data provide a basis for predicting the potential geographical range of this species and for developing phenological models to predict the timing of immature stages, both of which are important for management programs

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available