4.4 Article

Electrophysiological and Behavioral Responses of Dendroctonus valens (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) to Four Bark Beetle Pheromones

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL ENTOMOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages 472-477

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1603/022.038.0221

Keywords

red turpentine beetle; frontalin; trans-verbenol; cis-verbenol; bark beetle phermone

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30525009, 30621003]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents [ChineseIPM0702]
  3. Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation [070411012, 070411029, TD200708]
  4. Youth Foundation of Anhui Educational Committee [2008jq1046zd]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The red turpentine beetle, Dendroctonus valens LeConte (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae), has caused extensive mortality of Pinus tabuliformis Carriere in north central China. The electrophysiological and behavioral activities of the four bark beetle pheromones, frontalin, exo-brevicomin, trans-verbenol, and cis-verbenol, singly or in combination with host-produced kairomones, were tested on red turpentine beetles. Both sexes showed a consistent electrophysiological response to the four test compounds. In Y-tube olfactometer bioassays, walking red turpentine beetles selected the host compound (+)-3-carene over any of the test compounds, but significantly higher numbers chose each tested pheromone over a blank control. The four compounds, tested singly or in combination, were not attractive to red turpentine beetles in field trapping studies in 2006 and 2007 and also did not significantly increase trap catch when combined with (+) -3-carene. Frontalin, alone or in combination with exo-brevicomin and trans-verbenol, significantly reduced the attractiveness of (+) -3-carene in 2006 but not in 2007. The possible roles of the pheromones in host and mate finding and selection are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available