4.3 Article

Black Carbon Measurements of Flame-Generated Soot as Determined by Optical, Thermal-Optical, Direct Absorption, and Laser Incandescence Methods

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages 209-215

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ees.2014.0038

Keywords

instrumentation; black carbon; measurement techniques

Funding

  1. EPA/DOE [DW-89-92298301]
  2. Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Black carbon (BC) is a primary particle matter component emitted as a result of incomplete combustion. Due to its light-absorbing nature, BC can exert both direct and indirect influence on global climate. There is no universal research or regulatory definition of BC; instead, a variety of instruments and analytical methods define BC operationally. This study used a constant, source-generated BC concentration in order to quantify the variation in BC measurements using 10 different instruments and methodologies. Instruments examined include a multiangle absorption photometer, a transmissometer, rack-mount, portable, and micro-aethalometers, a thermal-optical carbon analyzer (using IMPROVE, NIOSH 5040, and NIST-EPA methods), a single-particle soot photometer (SP2), and a three-wavelength photoacoustic soot spectrometer (PASS3). BC-bearing soot was generated using an ethylene-air diffusion flame, diluted to similar to 100 mu g/m(3), which was subjected to simultaneous analyses. Measured BC and elemental carbon (EC) concentrations ranged from 20.5 to 39.9 mu g/m(3). BC concentrations measured by aethalometers and transmissometer instruments varied by <15%. However, measurements of BC were as much as 52% greater than EC determined by thermal-optical techniques. Gravimetric data from the current study suggest that the thermal-optical measurements of EC likely underestimated the carbon in flame soot samples, indicating an inability to close a carbon mass balance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available