4.6 Article

A comparison of five methods in landslide susceptibility assessment: a case study from the 330-kV transmission line in Gansu Region, China

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES
Volume 77, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-018-7814-7

Keywords

Landslide susceptibility; GIS; AHP model; IV model; FT model; BPNN model; SVM model

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC1501303]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41602316]
  3. Science and Technology Project of State Grid Corporation of China [GCB17201700121]
  4. Laboratory Research Funds of China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) [SJ-201812]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Landslides cause damages to land and infrastructure and pose serious threat to human survival. To prepare a landslide susceptibility map of the region in Longnan, City Gansu Province, with a 330-kV transmission line, 10 parameters were selected by correlation analysis and sensitivity analysis from initial 18 and five different methods were used, including analytical hierarchy process (AHP), information value (IV), fractal theory (FT), back propagation neural network (BPNN), support vector machine (SVM). The susceptibility maps were validated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and cumulative landslides percentage curves based on 77 existing landslide events. The results indicate that BPNN and SVM model are most accurate, time-saving and easily implemented. All of the five methods accurately predict the spatial distribution of landslides and can be well applied to landslide susceptibility mapping. What needs to be emphasized is that the machine learning methods have the advantages of high efficiency, accurate prediction, time-saving, convenient implementation, which are relatively new and better evaluation models of susceptibility.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available