4.6 Article

Trace metals in Daihai Lake sediments, Inner Mongolia, China

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES
Volume 71, Issue 1, Pages 255-266

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-013-2429-5

Keywords

Daihai Lake; Surface sediment; Trace metal; Enrichment

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41106108]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2012059, 2012028]
  3. Special Fund for Public Welfare Industrial Research of the Ministry of Land and Resources of China [201011019-05]
  4. Important National Science & Technology Specific Projects [2011ZX05023-002-005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A total of 29 surface sediments were collected from the Daihai Lake, China. Concentrations of metals (Cu, Pb, Zn, and Cd) were determined using HR-ICP-MS after digestion with the mixture of HNO3-HF-HCl (aqua regia), and chemically fractionated according to the modified the European Community Bureau of Reference sequential extraction procedure. Total organic carbon contents and grain size were also analyzed. Average concentrations (ppm) for Cu (39.4 +/- A 10.6), Pb (29.9 +/- A 6.1), Zn (102.6 +/- A 23.3), and Cd (0.21 +/- A 0.07) were found in the sediments. The concentrations of metals are relatively higher in the central area of lake, while lower nearby the area with a shallower water depth. Sequential extraction results show that Cu and Zn are mainly distributed in the residual fraction, while Cd is dominantly in the non-residual fraction. Enrichment factor values and geoaccumulation indexes suggest that there are not obvious enrichments of Cu, Pb, and Zn in the sediments, but Cd pollution can be found in most of the area of Daihai Lake. The sources for Cu, Pb, and Zn are attributed to atmospheric deposition, which might be mainly associated with coal combustion. Agricultural runoff in polluted soils and coal combustion might be main sources of the Cd pollution in the lake.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available