4.6 Article

Hydrogeochemical genesis of groundwaters with abnormal fluoride concentrations from Zhongxiang City, Hubei Province, central China

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES
Volume 60, Issue 3, Pages 633-642

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-009-0203-5

Keywords

Fluoride; Groundwater; Hydrogeochemistry; Anion exchange; Evaporation; Zhongxiang City

Funding

  1. Open Fund of State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province of China [2007ABA312]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40702041, 40425001]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [200801333]
  5. Open Fund of State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources [GPMR200714]
  6. Open Fund of MOE Key Laboratory of Biogeology and Environmental Geology [BGEGF200813]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The groundwaters from Zhongxiang City, Hubei Province of central China, have high fluoride concentration up to 3.67 mg/L, and cases of dental fluorosis have been found in this region. To delineate the nature and extent of high fluoride groundwaters and to assess the major geochemical factors controlling the fluoride enrichment in groundwater, 14 groundwater samples and 5 Quaternary sediment samples were collected and their chemistry were determined in this study. Some water samples from fissured hard rock aquifers and Quaternary aquifers have high fluoride concentrations, whereas all karst water samples contain fluoride less than 1.5 mg/L due to their high Ca/Na ratios. For the high fluoride groundwaters in the fissured hard rocks, high HCO(3)(-) concentration and alkaline condition favor dissolution of fluorite and anion exchange between OH-in groundwater and exchangeable F-in some fluoride-bearing minerals. For fluoride enrichment in groundwaters of Quaternary aquifers, high contents of fluoride in the aquifer sediments and evapotranspiration are important controls.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available