4.3 Review

Glutamate and dopamine in schizophrenia: An update for the 21st century

Journal

JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages 97-115

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0269881114563634

Keywords

Schizophrenia; psychosis; mechanisms; treatment; antipsychotic; imaging; aetiology; PET; MR; dopamine; glutamate; NMDA; D2

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council (UK) [MC-A656-5QD30]
  2. National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Council
  3. Medical Research Council [G0700995, MC_U120097115, 1116129] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. National Institute for Health Research [ACF-2014-17-008] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. MRC [G0700995, MC_U120097115] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The glutamate and dopamine hypotheses are leading theories of the pathoaetiology of schizophrenia. Both were initially based on indirect evidence from pharmacological studies supported by post-mortem findings, but have since been substantially advanced by new lines of evidence from in vivo imaging studies. This review provides an update on the latest findings on dopamine and glutamate abnormalities in schizophrenia, focusing on in vivo neuroimaging studies in patients and clinical high-risk groups, and considers their implications for understanding the biology and treatment of schizophrenia. These findings have refined both the dopamine and glutamate hypotheses, enabling greater anatomical and functional specificity, and have been complemented by preclinical evidence showing how the risk factors for schizophrenia impact on the dopamine and glutamate systems. The implications of this new evidence for understanding the development and treatment of schizophrenia are considered, and the gaps in current knowledge highlighted. Finally, the evidence for an integrated model of the interactions between the glutamate and dopamine systems is reviewed, and future directions discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available