4.2 Article

Repetitive Exposure to Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Induces DNA Damage in Human Nasal Mucosa Mini Organ Cultures

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS
Volume 52, Issue 7, Pages 582-589

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/em.20661

Keywords

zinc oxide; nanoparticles; nasal mucosa cells; mini organ culture; genotoxicity

Funding

  1. Rudolf-Bartling-Stiftung

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Data on the toxicological properties of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) is incomplete. ZnO-NPs may enter humans via inhalation or ingestion. The aim of the current study was to evaluate ZnO-NP-induced genotoxicity in three-dimensional (3D) mini organ cultures (MOCs) of human nasal mucosa following repeated exposure to ZnO-NP and regeneration. Nasal MOCs of 10 patients and ZnO-NPs were cultivated for one week and then characterized by electron microscopy. Nasal MOCs were partially covered by ciliated epithelium after one week of cultivation. ZnO-NPs were distributed to the cytoplasm and the nucleus. MOCs were exposed once, twice, or three times to 0.1 or 5 mu g/ml of ZnO-NPs for 1 hr per exposure and were then evaluated for cytotoxicity and genotoxicity. MOCs were cultivated for 24 hr after the triple ZnO-NP exposure to allow for regeneration. ZnO-NP exposure did not result in significant cytotoxicity or apoptosis, as determined by trypan blue exclusion and caspase-3 activity, respectively. A significant increase in DNA damage was detected following repetitive exposure compared to single exposure to ZnO-NPs at 5 mu g/ml, but not 0.1 mu g/ml ZnO-NPs. At both concentrations of ZnO-NP, DNA fragmentation increased after 24 hr of regeneration. In contrast, DNA damage which was induced by the positive control, methyl methanesulfonate, was significantly reduced after 24-hr regeneration. Thus, our results suggest that repetitive exposure to low concentrations of ZnO-NPs results in persistent or ongoing DNA damage. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 52:582-589, 2011. (C) 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available