4.7 Article

Plasticity of rice tiller production is related to genotypic variation in the biomass response to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration and low temperatures during vegetative growth

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
Volume 87, Issue -, Pages 227-234

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2012.11.008

Keywords

Biomass; Climate change; Elevated atmospheric CO2; Low temperature; Rice; Tiller

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Appropriate resource partitioning to either prodtiction of new tillers or growth of individual tillers is a critical factor for increasing rice biomass production and facilitating adaptation to climate change. We examined the contributions of genotypic variation to the tiller number and individual tiller growth of 24 rice cultivars in response to an elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration [CO2] (control + 191 mu mol mol(-1)) and a low air temperature (control minus 4.7 degrees c) during 56 days of vegetative growth after transplanting. For all genotypes combined, biomass increased by 27% under elevated [CO2] and decreased by 34% at low temperature, with a significant genotype x temperature interaction. The increase caused by elevated [CO2] resulted from increased tiller number, and the decrease caused bylaw temperature resulted from decreased growth of individual tillers. Despite the different overall responses to elevated [CO2] and low temperature, most of the genotypic variation in biomass at elevated [CO2] and low temperature was explained by the responses of tiller number rather than by individual tiller growth. The genotypes with the highest biomass response to elevated [CO2] had a smaller reduction of biomass under low temperature. These results highlight the greater importance of genotypic variation in tiller number than in individual tiller growth in the response of biomass to environmental change. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available