4.8 Article

Three decades (1983-2010) of contaminant trends in East Greenland polar bears (Ursus maritimus). Part 1: Legacy Organochlorine contaminants

Journal

ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL
Volume 59, Issue -, Pages 485-493

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2012.09.004

Keywords

Polar bear; Ursus maritimus; DDT; Legacy contaminants; PCB; Temporal trends

Funding

  1. Greenland Institute of Natural Resources (Nuuk), Aage V. Jensen's Foundation
  2. DANCEA (Danish Cooperation for Environment in the Arctic) programme including the CORE programme
  3. KVUG (The Commission for Scientific Research in Greenland)
  4. Prince Albeit II Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Legacy organochlorine contaminants were determined in adipose tissues from 294 polar bears (Ursus maritimus) sampled in East Greenland in 23 of the 28 years between 1983 and 2010. Of 19 major legacy contaminants and congeners (Sigma PCB, 4 PCB congeners (CB153, 180, 170/190), Sigma DDT, p,p'-DDE, p,p'-DDD and p,p'-DDT, alpha- and beta-hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH), HCB, octachlorostyrene, dieldrin, oxychlordane, cis- and trans-chlordane, cis- and trans-nonachlor, heptachlor epoxide and BB-153), 18 showed statistically significant average yearly declines of -4.4% (range: -2.0 to -10.8%/year) among subadult polar bears (i.e. females <5 years, males <6 years). For example, the Sigma PCB concentrations declined 2.7 fold from 22730 ng/g lw (95% C.I.: 12470-32990 ng/g lw) in 1983-1986 to 8473 ng/g lw (95% C.I.: 6369-9776 ng/g lw) in 2006-2010. Similar but fewer statistically significant trends were found for adult females and adult males likely due to smaller sample size and years. Despite declines as a result of international regulations, relatively high levels of these historic pollutants persist in East Greenland polar bear tissues. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available