4.7 Article

Cost-based optimal maintenance decisions for corroding natural gas pipelines based on stochastic degradation models

Journal

ENGINEERING STRUCTURES
Volume 74, Issue -, Pages 74-85

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.05.018

Keywords

Pipeline; Metal-loss corrosion; Gamma process; Poisson process; Maintenance; Minimum expected cost rule

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Council (NSERC) of Canada
  2. TransCanada Pipelines Ltd. through the Collaborative Research and Development (CRD) program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the optimal inspection interval for newly-built onshore underground natural gas pipelines with respect to external metal-loss corrosion by considering the generation of corrosion defects over time and time-dependent growth of individual defects. The non-homogeneous Poisson process is used to model the generation of new defects and the homogeneous gamma process is used to model the growth of individual defects. A realistic maintenance strategy that is consistent with the industry practice and accounts for the probability of detection (PoD) and sizing errors of the inspection tool is incorporated in the investigation. Both the direct and indirect costs of failure are considered. A simulation-based approach is developed to numerically evaluate the expected cost rate at a given inspection interval. The minimum expected cost rule is employed to determine the optimal inspection interval. An example gas pipeline is used to examine the impact of the cost of failure, PoD, the excavation and repair criteria, the growth rate of the defect depth, the instantaneous generation rate of the generation model and defect generation model on the optimal inspection interval through parametric analyses. The results of the investigation will assist engineers in making the optimal maintenance decision for corroding natural gas pipelines and facilitate the reliability-based corrosion management. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available