4.7 Article

Finite element modeling of confined concrete-I: Drucker-Prager type plasticity model

Journal

ENGINEERING STRUCTURES
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages 665-679

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.11.014

Keywords

Confinement; Concrete; FRP; Plasticity; Finite elements; Modelling

Funding

  1. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [50329802]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper first presents a critical review and assessment of the ability of the existing Drucker-Prager (D-P) type concrete plasticity models to predict the behavior of confined concrete using both experimental observations and numerical results. This assessment shows that for a D-P plasticity model to Succeed in predicting the behavior of FRP-confined and other passively-confined concrete, it needs to be modified to possess the following three features: (a) a yield criterion including the third deviatoric stress invariant: (b) a hardening/softening rule which is dependent oil the confining pressure: and (c) a flow rule which is dependent not only oil the confining pressure but also oil the rate of confinement increment. None of the existing D-P type models includes ail three features, so they cannot be expected to lead to accurate predictions for both actively-confined and passively-confined (e.g. FRP-confined) concrete. A modified D-P type model, which includes all three features mentioned above, is then presented in this paper. The capability of the proposed model in providing close predictions of the behavior of both actively confined and FRP-confined concrete is next demonstrated through comparisons between numerical predictions obtained using this modified D-P type model and available test results. Finally, the limitations of the proposed plasticity model are discussed. These limitations are addressed in the companion paper through the development of a plastic-damage model. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available