Journal
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY
Volume 114, Issue 2, Pages 223-228Publisher
MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.02.002
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Statement of problem. Prosthetic crown fit to the walls of the tooth preparation may vary depending on the material used for crown fabrication. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to compare the marginal and internal fit of crown copings fabricated from 3 different materials. Material and methods. The selected materials were zirconia (ZirkonZahn system, group Y-TZP), lithium disilicate (IPS e.max Press system, group LSZ), and nickel-chromium alloy (lost-wax casting, group NiCr). Five specimens of each material were seated on standard dies. An x-ray microtomography (micro-CT) device was used to obtain volumetric reconstructions of each specimen. Points for fit measurement were located in Adobe Photoshop, and measurements were obtained in the CTAn SkyScan software environment. Marginal fit was measured at 4 points and internal fit at 9 points in each coping. Mean measurements from the 3 groups were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) at the 5% significance level, and between-group differences were assessed with the Tukey range test. Results. The nickel-chromium alloy exhibited the best marginal fit overall, comparable with zirconia and significantly different from lithium disilicate. Lithium disilicate exhibited the lowest mean values for internal fit, similar to zirconia and significantly different from the nickel-chrome alloy. Conclusions. The marginal and internal fit parameters of the 3 tested materials were within clinically acceptable range.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available