4.7 Article

Use of mercury intrusion porosimetry for microstructural investigation of reconstituted clays at high water contents

Journal

ENGINEERING GEOLOGY
Volume 158, Issue -, Pages 15-22

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.03.002

Keywords

Reconstituted clay; Mercury intrusion porosimetry; Freeze-drying; Pore size distribution; Inter-aggregate; Intra-aggregate

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, NSERC
  2. University of Western Ontario

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of mercury intrusion porosimetry to investigate the fabric of different porous media is becoming more common. In this study, the effects of variations in moisture content on the pore size distribution of two clays was studied for specimens over a large range of liquidity indices from 0 to 3 (gravimetric moisture content range of 23 to 98%) prepared by freeze-drying. This analysis was also performed on air-dried specimens, to study fabric changes and particle rearrangements due to air-drying. The mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) results confirmed the existence of two major groups of pores within the material, i.e. intra- and inter-cluster pores. It was found that the addition of water to air-dried clay increased the volume of inter-cluster pores, leaving intra-cluster pores almost constant. Any further increase in the moisture content of the wet material was also attributed to changes in the inter-cluster pore volume. Amongst the inter-cluster pores, smaller diameter pores were more sensitive to changes in moisture content. In addition, limitations associated with using MIP analysis on saturated clays with a high moisture content are discussed. It is shown that due to an inability to detect all of the large pores, MIP underestimates the void ratio of specimens with a moisture content higher than 50%, regardless of the liquidity index. (c) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available