4.7 Article

Generalized displacement correlation method for estimating stress intensity factors

Journal

ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS
Volume 88, Issue -, Pages 90-107

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.04.010

Keywords

Fracture mechanics; Stress intensity factor; Displacement correlation method; Quarter-point element; Fracture propagation; Fracture interaction

Categories

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [DE-AC52-07NA27344]
  2. US Department of Energy
  3. LLNL LDRD [11-SI-006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Conventional displacement-based methods for estimating stress intensity factors require special quarter-point finite elements in the first layer of elements around the fracture tip and substantial near-tip region mesh refinement. This paper presents a generalized form of the displacement correlation method (the GDC method), which can use any linear or quadratic finite element type with homogeneous meshing without local refinement. These two features are critical for modeling dynamic fracture propagation problems where locations of fractures are not known a priori. Because regular finite elements' shape functions do not include the square-root terms, which are required for accurately representing the near-tip displacement field, the GDC method is enriched via a correction multiplier term. This paper develops the formulation of the GDC method and includes a number of numerical examples, especially those consisting of multiple interacting fractures. We find that the proposed method using quadratic elements is accurate for mode-I and mode-II fracturing, including for very coarse meshes. An alternative formulation using linear elements is also demonstrated to be accurate for mode-I fracturing, and acceptable mode-II results for most engineering applications can be obtained with appropriate mesh resolution, which remains considerably less than that required by most other methods for estimating stress intensities. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available