4.7 Article

Failure analysis of a second stage blade in a gas turbine engine

Journal

ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages 1111-1129

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2007.11.020

Keywords

blade failure; hot corrosion; fatigue failure; Inconel 738LC; finite element

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The failure of a second stage blade in a gas turbine was investigated by metallurgical and mechanical examinations of the failed blade. The blade was made of a nickel-base alloy Inconel 738LC. The turbine engine has been in service for about 73,500 h before the blade failure at 5:50 PM on 14 August 2004. Due to the blade failure, the turbine engine was damaged severely. The investigation was started with a thorough visual inspection of the turbine and the blades surfaces, followed by the fractography of the fracture surfaces, microstructural investigations, chemical analysis and hardness measurement. The observation showed that a serious pitting was occurred on the blade surfaces and there were evidences of fatigue marks in the fracture surface. The microstructural changes were not critical. It was found that the crack initiated by the hot corrosion from the leading edge and propagated by fatigue and finally, as a result of the reduction in cross-section area, fracture was completed. An analytical calculation parallel to the finite element method was utilized to determine the static stresses due to huge centrifugal force. The dynamic characteristics of the turbine blade were evaluated by the finite element modal and harmonic analyses. Finally according to the log sheet records and by using a Campbell diagram there was a good agreement between the failure signs and FEM results which showed the broken blade has been resonated by the third vibrational mode occasionally before the failure occurred. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available