4.7 Article

Two-level and hybrid ensembles of decision trees for high performance concrete compressive strength prediction

Journal

ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Volume 26, Issue 7, Pages 1689-1697

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2013.03.014

Keywords

Bagging (bootstrap aggregation); Decision trees; Stochastic gradient boosting; Hybrid ensembles; High performance concrete strength; Random sub-spaces

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurate prediction of high performance concrete (HPC) compressive strength is very important issue. In the last decade, a variety of modeling approaches have been developed and applied to predict HPC compressive strength from a wide range of variables, with varying,success. The selection, application and comparison of decent modeling methods remain therefore a crucial task, subject to ongoing researches and debates. This study proposes three different ensemble approaches: (i) single ensembles of decision trees (DT) (ii) two-level ensemble approach which employs same ensemble learning method twice in building ensemble models (iii) hybrid ensemble approach which is an integration of attribute-base ensemble method (random sub-spaces RS) and instance-base ensemble methods (bagging Bag, stochastic gradient boosting GB). A decision tree is used as the base learner of ensembles and its results are benchmarked to proposed ensemble models. The obtained results show that the proposed ensemble models could noticeably advance the prediction accuracy of the single DT model and for determining average determination of correlation, the best models for HPC compressive strength forecasting are GB-RS DT, RS-GB DT and GB-GB DT among the eleven proposed predictive models, respectively. The obtained results show that the proposed ensemble models could noticeably advance the prediction accuracy of the single DT model and for determining determination of correlation (R-max(2)), the best models for HPC compressive strength forecasting are GB-RS DT (R-2=0.9520), GB-GB DT (R-2=0.9456) and Bag-Bag DT (R-2=0.9368) among the eleven proposed predictive models, respectively. Crown Copyright (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available