4.7 Article

A nature-inspired multi-objective optimisation strategy based on a new reduced space searching algorithm for the design of alloy steels

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2010.01.017

Keywords

Nature-inspired algorithm; Search strategy; Reduced space searching; Multi-objective optimisation; Evolutionary algorithms; Optimal design; Alloy steel; Mechanical property; Tensile strength

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/E063497/1, EP/F023464/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. EPSRC [EP/E063497/1, EP/F023464/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a salient search and optimisation algorithm based on a new reduced space searching strategy, is presented. This algorithm originates from an idea which relates to a simple experience when humans search for an optimal solution to a 'real-life' problem, i.e. when humans search for a candidate solution given a certain objective, a large area tends to be scanned first; should one succeed in finding clues in relation to the predefined objective, then the search space is greatly reduced for a more detailed search. Furthermore, this new algorithm is extended to the multi-objective optimisation case. Simulation results of optimising some challenging benchmark problems suggest that both the proposed single-objective and multi-objective optimisation algorithms outperform some of the other well-known Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs). The proposed algorithms are further applied successfully to the optimal design problem of alloy steels, which aims at determining the optimal heat treatment regime and the required weight percentages for chemical composites to obtain the desired mechanical properties of steel hence minimising production costs and achieving the overarching aim of 'right-first-time production' of metals. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available