4.6 Article

Simplified BEM/FEM model for dynamic analysis of structures on piles and pile groups in viscoelastic and poroelastic soils

Journal

ENGINEERING ANALYSIS WITH BOUNDARY ELEMENTS
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages 25-34

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2008.04.003

Keywords

Pile foundations; Dynamics; Boundary elements; Frequency domain; Soil-structure interaction; Soil-pile interaction

Funding

  1. Comision Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnologia of Spain [DPI 2001-2377-CO2-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A simplified model for the analysis of the dynamic response of structures on piles and pile groups under time harmonic excitation is presented in this paper. It is a coupled boundary element-finite element model able to take into account dynamic pile-soil-pile interaction in a rigorous manner. Piles and pile groups in viscoelastic or poroelastic soils are considered. Two-node cylindrical boundary elements are used to represent the interface between soil and pile. These elements are connected to beam-type finite elements representing the concrete pile which can be connected to a pile cap and to any superstructure modeled by beam elements. The model is rather simple: two-node beam elements along the pile are directly connected to the BE nodes along the soil hole, and the uppermost node to the soil surface and to the FE nodes of any Superstructure. Thus, large structures founded on piles in viscoelastic or poroelastic soils can be represented using a reasonable number of unknowns. In order to validate the procedure, single piles and pile groups in viscoelastic and poroelastic soils are analyzed. The obtained results are compared with those obtained by other authors using more complex or less general approaches. There is a good agreement between the present results and those reported in the literature. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available