4.8 Article

In situ growth of ruthenium oxide-nickel oxide nanorod arrays on nickel foam as a binder-free integrated cathode for hydrogen evolution

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 274, Issue -, Pages 114-120

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.038

Keywords

Water electrolysis; Hydrogen evolution reaction; Ruthenium oxide; Nickel oxide; Nanorod arrays

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB720300, 2012CB215500]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21306232, 21276291]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [CDJZR12228802]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper we describe a novel catalyst based on RuO2-NiO nanorod arrays constructed in situ on a Ni foam substrate by a hydrothermal process for catalyzing the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). Field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), cyclic voltammetry (CV), linear scanning voltammetry (LSV), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) are used to systematically investigate the microstructure, composition, and electrochemical performance of the catalyst. The prepared electrode exhibits excellent HER performance and long-term stability. This impressive electrochemical performance is largely attributed to the material's unique nanostructure. Noticeable the presence of nickel oxide/hydroxide on the surface of the catalyst promotes the dissociation of water and the formation of hydrogen intermediates that can then adsorb onto the nearby ruthenium species and recombine into molecular hydrogen at a very rapid rate. The hydrothermal method for directly growing electroactive nanostructured arrays on a conductive substrate offers a promising route for developing a new class of Ni-based high performance electrodes for the HER in practical applications. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available