4.8 Article

High power TiO2 and high capacity Sn-doped TiO2 nanomaterial anodes for lithium-ion batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 294, Issue -, Pages 94-102

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.06.039

Keywords

Tin doped titania; Continuous hydrothermal flow synthesis; Lithium ion battery; Anatase; Anode; High power

Funding

  1. Centre for Doctoral Training in Molecular Modelling & Materials Science [EP/L015862/1]
  2. A Star (Singapore)
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/M009394/1, 1353578, 1570039] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. EPSRC [EP/M009394/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A range of phase-pure anatase TiO2 (similar to 5 nm) and Sn-doped TiO2 nanoparticles with the formula Ti-1-xSnxO2 (where x = 0, 0.06, 0.11 and 0.15) were synthesized using a continuous hydrothermal flow synthesis (CHFS) reactor. Charge/discharge cycling tests were carried out in two different potential ranges of 3 to 1 V and also a wider range of 3 to 0.05 V vs Li/Li+. In the narrower potential range, the undoped TiO2 nanoparticles display superior electrochemical performance to all the Sn-doped titania crystallites. In the wider potential range, the Sn-doped samples perform better than undoped TiO2. The sample with composition Ti0.85Sn0.15O2, shows a capacity of ca. 350 mAh g(-1) at an applied constant current of 100 mA g(-1) and a capacity of 192.3 mAh g-1 at a current rate of 1500 mA g(-1). After 500 charge/discharge cycles (at a high constant current rate of 382 mA g(-1)), the same nanomaterial anode retains a relatively high specific capacity of 240 mAh g(-1). The performance of these nanomaterials is notable, particularly as they are processed into electrodes, directly from the CHFS process (after drying) without any post-synthesis heat-treatment, and they are made without any conductive surface coating. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available