4.8 Article

Prospects for reducing the processing cost of lithium ion batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 275, Issue -, Pages 234-242

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.11.019

Keywords

Lithium-ion battery; Cost reduction study; Electrode processing; Aqueous colloidal chemistry; Thick electrodes; Formation cycle

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  2. Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Vehicle Technologies Office (VTO) (Program Manager: David Howell) Applied Battery Research subprogram (Program Manager: Peter Faguy)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A detailed processing cost breakdown is given for lithium-ion battery (LIB) electrodes, which focuses on: 1) elimination of toxic, costly N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP) dispersion chemistry; 2) doubling the thicknesses of the anode and cathode to raise energy density; and 3) reduction of the anode electrolyte wetting and SEI-layer formation time. These processing cost reduction technologies generically adaptable to any anode or cathode cell chemistry and are being implemented at ORNL This paper shows step by step how these cost savings can be realized in existing or new LIB manufacturing plants using a baseline case of thin (power) electrodes produced with NMP processing and a standard 10-14-day wetting and formation process. In particular, it is shown that aqueous electrode processing can cut the electrode processing cost and energy consumption by an order of magnitude. Doubling the thickness of the electrodes allows for using half of the inactive current collectors and separators, contributing even further to the processing cost savings. Finally wetting and RI-layer formation cost savings are discussed in the context of a protocol with significantly reduced time. These three benefits collectively offer the possibility of reducing LIB pack cost from $502.8 kW h(-1)-usable to $370.3 kW h(-1)-usable, a savings of $132.5/kWh (or 26.4%). (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available