4.8 Article

Tris(trimethylsilyl)borate as an electrolyte additive for improving interfacial stability of high voltage layered lithium-rich oxide cathode/carbonate-based electrolyte

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 285, Issue -, Pages 360-366

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.03.113

Keywords

Tris(trimethylsilyl)borate Layered lithium-rich oxide; Carbonate-based electrolyte; Additive; Cyclic performance; Interfacial stability

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [U1134002]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation [21273084]
  4. Key Project of Science and Technology in Guangdong Province [2013B090800013]
  5. Scientific Research Project of Department of Education of Guangdong Province [2013CXZDA013]
  6. Dongguan City Project for Industries, Universities and Institutes [2014509136101]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tris(trimethylsilyl)borate (TMSB) is used as an electrolyte additive for high voltage lithium-rich oxide cathode of lithium ion battery. The interfacial natures of Li[Li0.2Mn0.54Ni0.13Co0.13]O-2/carbonate-based electrolyte are investigated with a combination of electrochemical measurements and physical characterizations. Charge/discharge tests show that the cyclic performance of Li[Li0.2Mn0.54Ni0.13Co0.13]O-2 in a mixed carbonate electrolyte is significantly improved by using TMSB. After 200 cycles between 2 V and 4.8 V (vs. Li/Li+) at 0.5 C rate, the capacity retention of Li[Li0.2Mn0.54Ni0.13Co0.13]O-2 is only 19% in the blank electrolyte, while it is improved to 74% when 0.5% TMSB is applied. The results from physical characterizations demonstrate that this excellent cyclic performance is attributed to the improved interfacial stability of Li[Li0.2Mn0.54Ni0.13Co0.13]O-2/electrolyte due to the thin and protective film generated by TMSB. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available