4.8 Article

A simple composite protective layer coating that enhances the cycling stability of lithium metal batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 284, Issue -, Pages 103-108

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.03.004

Keywords

Composite protective layer; High current density; Lithium ion battery; Lithium metal; Lithium plating

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea - Korean Government (MEST) [NRF-2009-0094219, NRF-2014R1A1A2056199]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2014R1A1A2056199, 2009-0094227] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metallic lithium is the most promising negative electrode for high-energy rechargeable batteries due to its extremely high specific capacity and its extremely low redox potential. However, the low cycle efficiency and lithium dendrite formation during the charge/discharge processes consistently hinder its practical application. In this report, we present a stabilized Li electrode on which a Li+ ion conductive inorganic/organic composite protective layer (CPL) is coated. With the introduction of the CPL, the Li dendrite growth and electrolyte decomposition are effectively suppressed; consequently, stable Li plating/stripping at high current densities up to 10 mA cm(-2) is possible. Nanoindentation tests demonstrate that the shear modulus of the CPL at narrow indentations is 1.8 times higher than that of the Li metal, which provides a theoretical understanding for its efficacy. Moreover, the LiCoO2/Li cell incorporating CPL exhibits excellent cycling stability up to 400 cycles at 1 mA cm(-2) (1 C-rate), which demonstrates practical applicability in Li ion batteries through replacing the graphite anode with a CPL-coated Li metal anode. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available