4.7 Article

The impact of international trade on China's industrial carbon emissions since its entry into WTO

Journal

ENERGY POLICY
Volume 69, Issue -, Pages 624-634

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.02.032

Keywords

International trade; Foreign direct investment; Industrial carbon emissions

Funding

  1. National Natural Sciences Foundation of China [71221061, 71372064]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-12-0542]
  3. Education Ministry Social Science of China [13JZD016]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2011JQ007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper employs the input-output (10) approach to analyze the scale and structure of embodied carbon emissions of China's 19 industry sectors during 2001-2011 and constructs a regression model to establish the relationship between energy intensity, per capita output, trade openness, foreign direct investment (FDI), trade comparative advantage, environmental regulation, technology, and CO2 emission intensity. Our results suggest that: China's international embodied carbon emission balance has been in a state of continuous growth for the period 2001-2011, and China has become a pollution haven; the relationship between per capita output and CO2 emission is inverse N-typed and China's industries are in the rising stage of the curve; FDI and trade comparative advantage are two main elements boosting China's carbon emissions; trade openness, environmental regulation, and technology will lower the growth rate of China's industrial carbon emissions (ICEs). Consequently, China's policies should center on adjusting the industry structure and scale of FDI inflows, transforming industries with trade comparative advantages into a clean type, facilitating environmental regulation level, and bringing in and developing low-carbon technology to avert China from being a pollution haven. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available